This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf. Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all of my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist. This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write. I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf. The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie. And it is where you want to be on a golf course.
I have written previously about the issue summarized by this headline: Pro golfer Phil Mickelson endorsing the new Saudi Golf League, despite that country’s horrible human rights record.
I do so again, the realization that any more comments by anyone, me included, could be assumed to prolong this issue. Still….
Mickelson paid a price for his comments, though they were made to the writer of what was called an “unauthorized biography of Mickelson,” and Mickelson apparently thought they were off-the-record. His biographer strongly disagreed.
For Mickelson, clearly a “public official” – not one in government, but one in the public eye — the price is growing larger by the day.
So far, the following firms have pulled back from endorsing Mickelson: American-Express (which removes Mickelson’s status as the host of the pro golf tournament in La Quinta, California), Callaway (the golf clubs Mickelson plays and has endorsed for years), Workday, Amstel Beer, and KPMG.
Rather than write more about this issue myself, I am going to provide brief excerpts of coverage that has appeared in major newspapers.
WASHINGTON POST: In a column that originally appeared under this headline – Phil Mickelson and the perils of sportswashing – the Post , interestingly, produced a new headline (How Phil Mickelson got clocked by his own backswing). It was the lead for a column by long-time excellent sports writer, John Feinstein, which included these excerpts:
“The Saudi Arabian soap opera involving some of golf’s biggest stars — notably Hall of Famer Phil Mickelson — appears to be a complicated tale.
“In fact, it’s very simple: It’s about money — and how reaching for more can damage even the best reputations.
“Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman believes that throwing millions of dollars at professional golfers can help him whitewash his reputation as the man who U.S. intelligence officials believe ordered the murder of Post contributing columnist Jamal Khashoggi.
“Players such as Mickelson have been ready to accept Mohammed’s cash, guaranteed to players up front, instead of sticking with the PGA Tour, where — for the most part — you are paid what you earn each week.”
MORE WASHINGTON POST: Editorial writers at the Post went on record under this headline: “Saudi Arabia is trying to distract from repression — 18 holes at a time.”
“Saudi Arabia has long had a knack for running its bad deeds through the wash, displaying to the world a squeaky-clean version of itself to distract from reports of brutal repression and a general disregard for civil liberties. The country’s latest attempt at reputation-laundering relies, cannily, on an institution known for neat presentation and exemplary decorum: professional golf.
“No doubt the PGA would like to squeeze every cent it can out of a beloved golfer’s 30-foot birdie putt or bunker shot placed right in the hole. But by suggesting these sins are on par with the abuses rampant under Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s rule, any golfer who flees the PGA for the SGL hits right into Saudi Arabia’s hand.
“Certainly, there are ways to take a stand against corporate greed besides aligning oneself with a notorious dictatorship. Indeed, corporate greed and that dictatorship are apt to find ways to be allies. Just look at former president Donald Trump, who reportedly is in talks to host the likely lucrative SGL events at his financially struggling clubs.
“Mickelson has apologized for his comments. But his blunt honesty might yet stymie the endeavor, by laying bare the moral compromise submitted to by would-be SGL players. Or maybe not. As PGA Tour star Brooks Koepka pointed out this past week, ‘Everyone talks about money. … They’ll get their guys.’ Still, it is to be hoped that even the most ardent golf fan would recognize a sellout.”
FROM THE DESERT SUN NEWSPAPER IN PALM SPRINGS: “In the wake of his controversial comments about a proposed Saudi Arabia-backed breakaway golf league and his perceived problems with the PGA Tour, Phil Mickelson will no longer serve as host of The American Express PGA Tour event in La Quinta.
“The PGA Tour confirmed to The Desert Sun on Saturday that Mickelson, who served as tournament host since 2020, will not return to that role in 2023. In addition, the Mickelson Foundation, formed in 2019 specifically to be the charitable arm of the tournament, will no longer be part of the event, the tour confirmed.”
WALL STREET JOURNAL COLUMN: “These are supposed to be easy days for Phil Mickelson.
“At 51, the veteran pro golfer is one of the most successful and recognizable players in the sport. His unexpected victory at the PGA Championship last spring was one of the best golf moments in eons, a thrilling crescendo on an already historic career.
“Now in his fourth professional decade, there’s no pressure for Mickelson to deliver memorable Sundays. Sponsors don’t need wins; they’re coasting on past deeds.
“Of course, if you know anything about the golfing life of Phil Mickelson, you know he has seldom made it easy on himself. He’s in the rough once more, this time off the course.
‘Mickelson is under siege and taking time away from golf after a series of remarks about his involvement in efforts to challenge the PGA Tour—an organization he feels has financially shorted its top players—by launching a Saudi-financed rival ‘Super Golf League.’”
NEW YORK TIMES STORY: The last paragraph of the story said this, though the Times did not write an editorial about the issue:
“I have experienced many successful and rewarding moments that I will always cherish, but I have often failed myself and others, too. The past 10 years I have felt the pressure and stress slowly affecting me at a deeper level. I know I have not been my best and desperately need some time away to prioritize the ones I love most and work on being the man I want to be.”
Enough excerpts.
But does Mickelson deserve to pay such a huge price? Well, not sure yet.
My quick thoughts:
- I wish one of my favorite golfers, Mickelson, would stick to what he does better than many others, which is to play golf.
- To criticize the PGA Tour, I wish Mickelson would have done so in private by talking with its CEO, Jay Monahan, and/or consulting with the Tour Council, a group of players that advises Monahan.
- I wish Mickelson would follow his apology in words (I liked most of what he said) with an “apology in actions.”
- And, I wish all of us, as Americans, would find a way to practice forgiveness, not just criticism.
The latter strikes me as a way for Mickelson to restore at least part of his reputation.