AS USUAL, OPB WRITES THE BEST STORY ON THE END OF THE LEGISLATIVE SESSION

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

As I write this blog headline, am I biased?

Yes. 

I represented Oregon Public Broadcasting (OPB) at the Capitol in Salem for about 10 years and my old firm still has the lobbying contract.

OPB is the best journalistic outfit going in the state, not just because newspapers are dying, but because of the way it practices its craft.  Accuracy and context are critical and, every day, OPB journalists excel at both.

Now, as for the end of the recent legislative session, there is no better way to mark the close than to reprint the OPB story.

Here goes.  This is a long piece, so may be more than you may want to read?  But, in legislative sessions, lawmakers  write new laws on the books, so what they choose to add matters to most Oregonians – including to you.

**********

By Dirk VanderHart (OPB) and Lauren Dake (OPB)

June 25, 2023 4:36 p.m.

The Capitol this year felt like a tale of two legislative sessions.

It was the best of times: In the first three months, lawmakers quickly and smoothly passed bipartisan bills to pave the way for more housing and attract new semiconductor activity.

It was the worst of times: Fractured over proposals on abortion and guns, the Senate saw the longest legislative walkout in state history. The six-week boycott ratcheted up rhetoric and pushed the session to the brink of collapse. It also will likely ensure 10 conservative lawmakers can’t seek reelection.

And in a final bewildering sprint that ended at 4:27 p.m. on Sunday, the session was chaos.

Over the course of eight frantic days, the chambers rushed to pass hundreds of bills, most with little or no discussion. The session concluded less than eight hours before lawmakers were required to adjourn under the state Constitution.

The tumult left some lawmakers with little overtly positive to say when asked how they’d encapsulate the session.

Rep. Greg Smith, R-Heppner, called it “untidy.” To Monmouth Democratic Rep. Paul Evans it was “a challenging, exasperating, impossible-to-accurately-explain kind of ride.”

Rep. David Gomberg, D-Otis, nodded to a $500 million renovation that turned the Capitol into an active construction site throughout the session. “We’ve got all the normal egos, pressure and challenges with half the space and constant pounding and grinding going on,” he said. “What could go wrong?”

Acrimony and delay tested the abilities of a new crop of legislative leaders, and will be a big piece of the session’s legacy. But lawmakers had done a lot by the time the final gavels fell — from putting record funding toward schools and housing, to trying to prop up a deeply broken public defense system, to granting Oregonians permission to pump their own gas.

“Sometimes it’s not pretty along the way,” Senate President Rob Wagner, D-Lake Oswego, said shortly after the session adjourned. “But the evidence is the bills that we pass, the budgets that we pass.”

His counterpart in the House, Speaker Dan Rayfield, D-Corvallis, called it “one of the most exciting and meaningful sessions I’ve ever been a part of.”

Republicans were also feeling accomplished.

“Senate Republicans were finally able to give the nearly 2 million Oregonians we represent a voice in the Senate and a seat at the table,” Senate Minority Leader Tim Knopp, R-Bend, said in a statement. “We protected the rights of parents and law-abiding gun owners, restored the rule of law, and forced good-faith bipartisanship to get good things done.”

Here’s a rundown of some of the session’s highlights.

New personalities and major battles

For the first time in two decades, the Senate had a new leader. Wagner took over the gavel from Peter Courtney, the longest-tenured chamber leader in state history.

The learning curve was steep. Even before the session began, Wagner was attacked as “untrustworthy” by Knopp, the Republican leader. The relationship only got worse from there.

Knopp announced in an early-session press conference that Republicans would insist on requiring Democrats to read bills in full before a vote — a delay tactic used to give the minority party leverage.

Republicans were soon accusing Wagner and other Democrats of violating state law requiring bill summaries to be written at an eighth-grade reading level and of queuing up extreme bills.

“If someone isn’t willing to follow the rules or the law, the public should be deeply disturbed,” Knopp said of Wagner.

Democrats paid little heed to the Republican objections until May 3, when GOP senators launched a walkout to block a bill on abortion and gender-affirming care.

The maneuver set off a 42-day slog in which negotiations between the parties broke down repeatedly. An effort to broker a peace by Gov. Tina Kotek — brand new to her role, as well — went nowhere.

Finally, on June 15, the parties finalized an agreement. In exchange for a series of notable concessions by Democrats, enough Republicans returned to the Senate to allow the chamber to pass bills.

If the GOP won back some ground, the victory came at a hefty cost. By walking away, 10 conservative senators ran afoul of a new law and are likely unable to run for reelection.

Things went far more smoothly in the House, Rayfield and Minority Leader Vikki Breese-Iverson, R-Prineville, began cultivating a working relationship during last year’s legislative session. The leaders navigated their members through the session with comparably little controversy.

“I think we have formed a friendship if you will,” Breese-Iverson said of Rayfield midway through the session.

Rayfield returned the sentiment Sunday, calling Breese-Iverson “wonderful to work with.”

The housing and homelessness crisis, a top concern

Lawmakers were optimistic in January, in part because there was agreement from both parties on the most pressing issues facing the state: housing and homelessness.

Before the walkout and political scandals overshadowed the session, lawmakers passed an ambitious $200 million housing package. The measure, approved in March, gives cities across the state an infusion of cash to address the housing crisis and earmarks $27 million for rural counties.

Cities will also be required for the first time to set and meet affordable housing building targets. In addition, the bill contains a larger philosophical shift when it comes to the state’s land-use laws and aims to streamline the often-litigious and lengthy process of bringing more land inside the urban growth boundary.

House Majority Leader Julie Fahey, D-Eugene, said the housing package will have a real impact on those living on the streets or struggling to stay housed.

“The work we accomplished over the last six months will make a real difference in the lives of Oregonians,” she said in a statement. “We laid the foundation to build more housing and get people off the streets and into shelters.”

Besides the marquee housing package, lawmakers passed a stricter rent-control measure, ensuring rental costs can’t increase by more than 10%, regardless of inflation. There also were bills to make it easier for renters to stay housed and to help first-time homebuyers purchase a home.

On the final day of the session, lawmakers considered House Bill 3414, a measure to allow cities to unilaterally expand urban growth boundaries, cutting through a lot of red-tape in what is usually a lengthy process. This measure would have sidestepped the normal process for expanding urban growth boundaries.

A standoff over the bill, and heartburn from some Democrats over what it would do, delayed votes for hours on Saturday. The bill was a priority for Gov. Tina Kotek, who has set ambitious housing production goals.

In the end, enough Democratic senators voted against the measure to kill it, a stinging loss for the first-term Democratic governor. A visit by Kotek to the Senate chamber shortly after the vote was not enough to revive the bill.

The defeat was, in a way, a tangible political casualty of the walkout. Ironically, the five conservative senators still boycotting Salem may have been the key votes to turn the tide in Kotek’s favor.

An unprecedented tool to boost semiconductors

Oregon lawmakers may have come into the session optimistic, but they were also feeling insecure.

Once a national darling for its semiconductor research prowess, the state in recent years has sat spurned as states like Ohio and Arizona notched major projects. Lawmakers were bent on reversing that tide.

One of the session’s first major acts was to set Oregon up to be competitive for some of the $52 billion in federal cash made available by the CHIPS and Science Act. By early April, the Legislature had approved a whopping $210 million to help local companies develop projects that could qualify for even more federal money. Lawmakers kicked in another $50 million after a revenue forecast showed the state had nearly $2 billion more to spend than anticipated.

In a controversial move, the Legislature also gave Gov. Tina Kotek unprecedented authority to rejigger the invisible lines that dictate where development can and cannot occur under the state’s 50-year-old land use laws. The tool will be necessary if Oregon finds itself in desperate need of hundreds of acres of new industrial land to be competitive for federal funds — something that’s far from certain at this point.

Lawmakers didn’t stop with that early package. Cheered on by business groups, they worked up a new tax credit that will benefit semiconductor companies that expand their research and development activities in the state.

But the $4 million maximum tax breaks per company they eventually passed were far lower than the $10 million credits initially proposed. Total tax credits to all applicants will max out at $35 million over the next two years — a number business lobbyists will work to grow in the future.

“I think at one point they wanted a $300 million research and development tax credit,” Rayfield said last week. “That was never, ever realistic.”

Parental rights, at the heart of the legislative walkout

The measure at the heart of the longest legislative walkout in state history does a lot. It protects medical providers from prosecution if they provide an abortion to people traveling from anti-abortion states and it expands insurance coverage to include laser hair removal and facial feminization surgery for people seeking gender-affirming care.

But the part of the measure that spurred Republicans to boycott the Senate chamber centered on parental rights. As originally drafted, the measure would have made it explicit that minors under the age of 15 didn’t need a parent’s permission for an abortion. Republicans and their allies railed against that provision, calling it an affront to parents’ rights.

As part of the deal to bring Republicans back to the Capitol, Democrats agreed to keep in place a legal requirement that parental permission is required for children under 15 to end a pregnancy. But that requirement can be overridden if health care providers conclude informing parents would be harmful to the child, according to a briefing with key players engaged in the negotiations.

Democrats also agreed to nix portions of the bill expanding abortion access on university campuses and in rural parts of the state.

Banning ‘ghost guns’

Republicans won significant concessions on the session’s major gun control bill. Democrats had hoped to increase the age to purchase and own most guns from 18 to 21 and allow cities to ban concealed weapons in public buildings. But in order to end the legislative boycott, Democrats scrapped those two components in the session’s major gun control bill.

The only part of House Bill 2005 to make it into law, will be the component banning “ghost guns,” 3-D printed firearms without serial numbers that are assembled at home and can be easily purchased online.

Democrats also agreed to kill Senate Bill 348 and a handful of other gun bills that would put some provisions of Measure 114, a gun safety law approved by voters last year, into statute. The ballot measure is currently on hold amid court challenges. It banned the sale or transfer of extended capacity magazine clips and required a permit to purchase a gun, among other restrictions.

Tweaks to Oregon’s drug decriminalization law

Oregon has long had one of the nation’s highest rates of substance abuse, and overdoses are soaring as cheap fentanyl floods the drug market.

After two sessions where they put more than $1 billion of state and federal money toward addiction and mental health services, lawmakers were more measured this year. They levied a 40-cent monthly tax on phone lines as part of a $153 million spending plan. The tax is expected to raise roughly $33 million over the next two years, and will be used to fund the 9-8-8 crisis hotline and community mobile crisis teams.

With House Bill 2395, the Legislature also ensured that the overdose-reversal drug naloxone will be far more available to the public.

And lawmakers passed a couple bills that tweak Measure 110, the drug decriminalization measure passed by voters in 2020.

One gives the Oregon Health Authority a more muscular role in funding treatment services around the state. The other makes it a misdemeanor to possess more than a gram — or five or more “user units” — of a substance containing fentanyl. Unlike other drugs, fentanyl had no misdemeanor-level possession under Oregon law following decriminalization. The tweak is designed to levy criminal consequences for small-time dealers of the drug.

Democrats refused to consider more sweeping changes to Measure 110, including an insistence by many Republicans that criminal consequences to drug possession should be brought back while the state expands its treatment options. Recent polling suggests most Oregonians would favor that change.

A public defense crisis demands attention

Lawmakers have known for years that the state’s threadbare public defense system is likely unconstitutional. Now it’s worse than ever, with hundreds of people languishing in jail without an attorney.

The ongoing crisis was one of the most pressing issues facing lawmakers this year. In response, they poured more than $100 million into the system to increase pay for public defenders, and fundamentally shifted the structure of the state system. Under Senate Bill 337, the state will move away from contracting for public defense with outside groups, and instead hire more defense attorneys itself.

“This is a step in the right direction towards a more sustainable approach to public defense in Oregon,” said Jessica Kampfe, who runs the state’s Office of Public Defense Services.

Lawmakers also took steps to ensure that people convicted by a nonunanimous verdict in Oregon — a practice that the Supreme Court has deemed illegal — can petition for a retrial.

And they passed bills creating news consequences for domestic terrorism and “paramilitary activity.” House Bill 2772 made it a felony to damage “critical infrastructure,” or disperse toxic substances in some circumstances. Under House Bill 2572, the state could investigate paramilitary activity — regardless of the politics attached — and ask a judge to block planned actions.

Sending a historic amount of money to K-12 schools

In May, lawmakers received very welcome news: Tax revenue was up, and by a lot.

The dramatic spike in funds meant lawmakers had more money to work with as they built the state’s next two-year budget. One of the beneficiaries: the K-12 school budget.

Lawmakers have approved a record amount of spending, putting $10.2 billion into the state school fund, which is $700 million more than current service levels and the most ever put into the fund, according to Democrats. Combined with local property tax revenues, the state’s public school budget should reach about $15.3 billion to be put toward educating the state’s students.

Lawmakers also carved out $140 million to help improve literacy for the state’s youngest students. The money would provide a wide range of support, from funding summer-and-after-school programs to curriculum. Lawmakers also passed a measure requiring Oregon high school students to take courses on how to create a budget, open a bank account, understand taxes and other general personal finance skills.

Once again, no action on campaign finance limits

Democrats now have a well established pattern when it comes to reining in political giving in Oregon: After touting new campaign finance rules as a top priority early in session, they fail to act.

While most people agree Oregon’s current system of no contribution limits is broken, no one can agree on what restrictions should look like. Top Democrats, including Kotek, floated proposals for a new campaign finance system this year, but the issue once again fell by the wayside. The ongoing gridlock on the issue means voters are increasingly likely to be asked to institute limits via a citizen-written ballot measure — perhaps in 2024.

Lawmakers weren’t idle on other election changes though. Democrats passed a bill that will expand Oregon’s pioneering “motor voter” law, which registers people to vote when they interact with Oregon Driver and Motor Services. Under House Bill 2107, people signing up for the Oregon Health Plan could also be registered. That step first needs to be approved by the federal government.

The state also took steps toward using ranked-choice voting — in which voters can pick candidates in order of preference — for statewide and congressional contests. Voters will need to give final approval to that system next year.

Lawmakers also banned the practice of making large campaign contributions in cash, after Willamette Week reported that two cannabis entrepreneurs were giving top Democrats bags full of cash. The practice, while legal, raised questions because such exchanges are difficult to track. As one part of Senate Bill 166, donors could give no more than $100 a year to a candidate in cash.

Capitol rocked by multiple scandals

Early in the session, an internal investigation by the Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission revealed top employees at the state agency diverted specialty bourbons away from public consumption for their own personal use for years. The longtime leader of the agency, Steve Marks, stepped aside once the news was revealed. But Gov. Tina Kotek had already demanded his resignation before she learned of the abuse within the agency. Republicans asked the governor to launch an independent investigation into the state agency and the revelations raised more questions about the agency’s costly efforts to build a new distribution warehouse.

The OLCC impropriety was quickly eclipsed, however, by a more shocking moment: the downfall of Secretary of State Shemia Fagan. A rising star in the Democratic party, Fagan resigned after Willamette Week revealed she had accepted a $10,000-a-month consulting contract from cannabis entrepreneurs and owners of La Mota while her office was auditing the cannabis industry.

Later in the session, lawmakers approved House Joint Resolution 16, asking voters to approve a constitutional amendment in 2024 that would allow legislators to impeach statewide elected officials. The Legislature also proposed creating an independent commission that could set the salaries of lawmakers and other state-level elected officials — partly a nod to Fagan’s complaint that her $77,000 annual salary was not adequate.

Money for the I-5 bridge, changes to self-serve gas, banning Styrofoam and more

With thousands of bills introduced early in the session, there is almost no limit to the issues lawmakers took up this session. Among other notable bills that are finding their way to Kotek’s desk:

  • Funding for a new Interstate Bridge: Lawmakers committed to borrowing $1 billion in bonds over the next eight years to fund the state’s share of the mega-project to replace the Interstate Bridge over the Columbia River connecting Portland and Vancouver. The Legislature’s move to approve funding comes at a critical juncture: Oregon and Washington have the chance to leverage state money to qualify for up to $2.5 billion in federal funding through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The bridge is one of the key bottlenecks along Interstate 5 between Canada and Mexico, and it’s the only drawbridge on the freeway.
  • Styrofoam container ban: Under Senate Bill 543, restaurants will need to ditch the wasteful to-go packaging by 2025. Foam coolers and packaging containing so-called PFAS are also on the way out.
  • Action on efficient buildings: The session’s major climate bill was actually an amalgamation of more than a dozen proposals. House Bill 3409 set goals for installing more heat pumps in Oregon and will require more energy-efficient buildings, among many other provisions. But Democrats punted on language that would have set stricter greenhouse gas reduction goals in order to avoid a standoff with the GOP.
  • Self-serve gas: After more than seven decades, drivers in every corner of Oregon will soon be allowed to pump their own gas, under House Bill 2426. The bill allows gas stations in the state’s most populous areas to designate up to half their pumps as self-serve. Many rural areas already allow the practice.
  • Animal protections: Lawmakers passed a bill that bans retail stores from selling puppies and kittens — a move to curtail irresponsible breeding operations. Driven by horror stories of cruel deaths at the primate research center operated by Oregon Health and Science University, the Legislature also passed a bill requiring OHSU to be more transparent about animals in its possession. And they took steps to block the availability of cosmetics that have been developed using animal testing.
  • No TikTok on state phones: The controversial app, owned by a Chinese firm, is the subject of mounting political concern in some circles that it could be used for surveillance. Oregon joined a growing number of states banning use of TikTok — and products from several other vendors — on state-owned phones.
  • Candidates can shield their addresses: Driven by concerns over increased political polarization, lawmakers passed a bill that allows political candidates to block the release of their home addresses when they file for office. That information still must be released under a formal public records request, but it will make the task of ensuring candidates reside in the district they are running to represent more onerous.
  • Set hospital staffing rules: Dodging what looked like it might be a major conflict, hospital managers and labor groups found an accord on new rules that will ensure hospitals meet minimum staffing levels. The aim is to cut down on burnout from employees and ensure adequate care for patients.

A TOP ARCHITECT DESIGNED ILLAHE HILLS GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

It is not necessarily a well-known fact, but the designer of Illahe Hills Golf and Country Club in Salem, Oregon was a golf course architect of some renown.  His name:  Billy Bell.  Actually, Billy Bell, Jr.

He has been credited with designing more than 50 courses, most in the Western United States, including, especially, in California.

Billy’s father, William Bell, Sr., was a more accomplished golf course architect, but appears to have passed down his ability to his son.

The father and son tandem have been described this way:

“The Bells: California’s First Family of Golf Course Design.  

While literally hundreds of golf course architects have designed or re-designed courses in California, few have had the lasting impact of William P. and William F. Bell.  [The former is the senior Bell; the latter, the junior.]

Bell, Sr. served as a construction superintendent for two famous architects, Willie Watson and George Thomas, Jr., before eventually stepping up to golf course architecture on his own.  He spent his first years as a course architect collaborating with Thomas on his great designs of the 1920s, including the Bel-Air, Riviera, and Los Angeles Country Clubs, the latter of which just hosted the U.S. Open.

Along the way, his son had a top-rated tutor in the golf course design business.

Bell, Sr. died in 1953, leaving behind his vision for the design of Torrey Pines, which his son went on to complete.

It was Bell Jr. who then worked on Illahe Hills, which opened in 1961. 

I have not been able to talk with Illahe’s founding members about why they hired Bell, nor how they enticed him to come to Salem to design a new course in a small city compared to major enclaves in California. 

But it was a good decision, given Illahe’s stature today.

Based on Bell’s design, the course where I live in Salem, Oregon has come to be a landmark in the state, a course known for its manicured fairways, hundreds of trees that come into play on every hole, about 80 re-worked bunkers, and greens that register among the best in the state as they often run to 11 on the stimp-meter.

If anyone plays Illahe for the first time and I get a chance to speak to them before they tee off, I always say this:  Try to stay below the hole on each of the 18 greens.  If you do, you’ll have a chance to score.  If you don’t, say goodbye to a good round.

It’s good advice for regular players, as well, including me.

Here’s what the Illahe Hills website says about the course and Bell, Jr.: “Welcome to Illahe Hills Country Club, providing a challenging golf experience in a grand setting.  A backdrop of trees line the traditional layout, designed by renowned golf course architect William Bell and opened for play in 1961.  Illahe Hills has played host to many of Oregon’s major golf events, as well as USGA Championships.”

Am I biased?

Sure.

I have been a member at Illahe for about 35 years and, during that time, one of my favorite sayings is this:  I never get tired of playing the course.

It offers something new every time I arrive at the 1st tee.

So, thanks to Billy Bell, Jr. for a great golf course design.

THESE NUMBERS MEAN A LOT!

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

390

390

390

1,170

What do these numbers mean?

Well, glad you asked.

They refer to the number of golf balls hit by 130 young players between the ages of seven and 15 who were at my home golf course, Illahe Hills Golf and Country Club yesterday for the regional Drive, Chip and Putt competition, which is sponsored jointly by the United States Golf Association and the national Professional Golfers Association.

Yes, 130 players were on hand.

Here’s what they did:

  • Each of the 130 players hit drives on our range – and, if you add that up, it comes to 390 drives.
  • Each of the 130 players hit chip shots on our chipping green – and, if you add that up, it comes to 390 chips.
  • Each of the 130 players hit putts on our putting green – and, if you add that up, it comes to 390 putts.
  • In all, that means 1,170 shots were hit by junior players during the six-hour event at our golf course.

At Illahe, we were glad to host these junior golfers because, to put a significant point on it, they are the future of the game we love.

The main purpose of the event was to create a fun atmosphere for kids.  But, of course, there were winners who will now go on to regional and sectional events, which, for some of them, will lead to the national Drive, Chip and Putt competition held in conjunction with the Masters Golf Tournament in Georgia next spring.

All of this comes on top of what Illahe Hills already does to support junior golf.

About 75 young people are involved in junior golf every week at the course.  They get instruction from Illahe pros and get to play three, six, or nine holes, depending on their ages.

At Illahe, junior golf matters.  And, I hope it does at all other courses.

Mr. Google puts it this way:

“Kids can benefit from the sport mentally, physically, and emotionally.  The sport can set them up for success as they get older.  Many of the skills learned on the course translate to real life.”

As a volunteer for junior golf programs in my home state, Oregon, I have seen the benefits first-hand.  The vast majority of junior golfers I have seen have used golf to prepare them for life.

INFLATION, HEALTH COSTS, PARTISAN COOPERATION AMONG THE NATION’S TOP PROBLEMS

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

How does the lack of bi-partisan cooperation rank on your list of major public policy issues facing this country?

Does it make your list at all?  Rank up there with abortion, gun control, and immigration?

If so, good.

If not, consider putting it on your list.

The headline in this blog summarizes the results of a new PEW study on America’s top problems, at least in the view of those who were polled.  [PEW, by the way, is a family name, not an acronym.]

And, for me, there was one surprising and welcome conclusion from the PEW study: Americans are concerned about the lack of bi-partisan cooperation among those who represent us in Congress and elsewhere.

I believe it is high-time Americans recognized this reality, which threatens the very democracy many of us say we hold dear.

Here is a quick summary of the PEW results, based on a survey conducted June 5-11 among 5,115 members of the organization’s American Trends Panel:

“The public’s list of the top problems facing the nation includes inflation, health care affordability, drug addiction, and gun violence.

“Yet, the ability of Republicans and Democrats to work together rates about as high on the problems list as these other concerns.  And it is one of the few, among 16 problems on which there is no partisan divide.

“Inflation remains the top concern for Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, with 77 per cent saying it is a very big problem.  The state of moral values, illegal immigration, and the budget deficit also are seen as top problems by at least two-thirds of Republicans.

“For Democrats and Democrat leaners, gun violence is the top concern, with about eight-in-ten – 81 per cent — saying it is a very big problem. The affordability of health care ranks second.

“Democrats are more than four times as likely as Republicans to say that climate change is a very big problem in the country.  Democrats are also much more likely to say gun violence and racism are very big problems.

“By contrast, Republicans are more than twice as likely as Democrats to say that illegal immigration is a very big problem.  They are also about 30 percentage points more likely than Democrats to say that the state of moral values and the budget deficit are very big problems.”

My career as a lobbyist underlines that bi-partisan cooperation – or, today, the lack of it – should be a top issue for all of America, no matter where you live.

All of us watch Congress melt down most of the time.  Then, we anticipate a presidential political campaign next year which is still taking shape, but which will underline the idea of differences, not agreement, on policy.  Criminal charges also will roil the campaigns.

In Oregon, we have witnessed political dissension, too, though Republicans and Democrats finally found a way to agree in Salem, which meant the end of the current legislative session occurred on time, June 25.

I hope the conduct of government will remain a top concern for all Americans, or if it is not already on your list, consider adding it.

CHRIS CHRISTIE GOES AFTER TRUMP: GOOD

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

We need Chris Christie now more than ever.

Why?

Christie, the former governor of New Jersey and once a strong supporter of Donald Trump, is now running for president.

And, so far, he is basically the only Republican who has been willing to go after Donald Trump.

Good for Christie.

By the way, a friend of mine asked me the other day why I still use my blog to write about Trump after my pledge several months ago not to do so.  Well, the answer is that, like Trump, I lied.

Better put.  I think Trump is such a threat to the nation that he deserves to be called out, even though my voice is only a small one out in the sticks in Oregon.

So, I aver, this blog is not about Trump.  It is about Christie.

In the New York Times a couple days ago, here is how columnist Frank
Bruni wrote about Christie:

““”“Chris Christie made a complete fool of himself back in 2016, fan-dancing obsequiously around Donald Trump, angling for a crucial role in his administration, nattering on about their friendship, pretending or possibly even convincing himself that Trump could restrain his ego, check his nastiness, suspend his grift and, well, serve America.

“But then Christie, the former two-term governor of New Jersey, had plenty of company.  And he never did style himself as some saint.

“It’s all water under the George Washington Bridge now.

“The Chris Christie of the current moment is magnificent.  I don’t mean magnificent as in, he’s going to win the Republican presidential nomination.  I don’t mean I’m rooting for a Christie presidency and regard him as the country’s possible salvation.

“But what he’s doing in this Republican primary is very, very important.  It also couldn’t be more emotionally gratifying to behold.  He’s telling the unvarnished truth about Trump, and he’s the only candidate doing that.  A former prosecutor, he’s artfully, aggressively and comprehensively making the case against Trump, knocking down all the rationalizations Trump has mustered and all the diversions he has contrived since his 37-count federal indictment.”

Bruni wrote that none of the other candidates comes close to what Christie is doing.  For the most part, he adds, “they’ve gagged themselves or decided to play laughable word games about who Trump is, what he has done, and what he may yet do.”

Here are other paragraphs from Bruni’s column, which I could have placed in the Department of Good Quotes Worth Remembering that I run.  But, I decided the Bruni words were worth highlighting on their own.

  • Christie is to DeSantis (Ron DeSantis, the governor of Florida and presidential candidate) what a Roman candle is to a scented votive. He explodes in a riot of color.  DeSantis, on his best days, flickers.
  • Christie’s prosects are about the hugely valuable contrast to other Republican presidential candidates that he’s providing.  The health of American democracy hinges on a reckoning within the Republican Party, and that won’t come from Democrats saying the kinds of things that Christie is now.  They’ve been doing that for years. It’ll come — if it even can — from the words and warnings of longtime Republicans who know how to get and use the spotlight.
  • Did you see Christie’s CNN town hall last week?  Have you watched or listened to any of his interviews?  He’s funny.  He’s lively.  He’s crisp.  And he’s right. Over the past few weeks, he has described Trump’s behavior as “vanity run amok.” Trump himself is “a petulant child.”
  • At the town hall: “Trump is voluntarily putting our country through this.  If at any point before the search in August of ’22 he had just done what anyone, I suspect, in this audience would have done, which is said, All right, you’re serious?  You’re serving a grand jury subpoena?  Let me just give the documents back,’ he wouldn’t have been charged.  Wouldn’t have been charged with anything even though he had kept them for almost a year and a half.”

If Christie qualifies for the Republican primary debates, a question has emerged about what he will do when asked what he will do about the required pledge that he support whoever winds up getting the party’s nomination.

“He has,” Bruni writes, “apparently found a solution that’s suited to Republicans’ willful and nihilistic captivity to Trump, the stupidity of the pledge and the stakes of the race:  He’ll sign what he must and later act as he pleases.”

Chris Christie, superhero?   No.  He has his own supersize vanity.  He is arguably playing the only part in the crowded primary field available to him.  

As for other Republican candidates – Ron DeSantis, Mike Pence, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley – they appear to be so concerned about offending Trump supporters that they won’t criticize him.

So, we are left with Christie – and I say do more truth-telling in this presidential campaign.  Trump deserves it.

WHY DO SOME VOTERS STILL SUPPORT DONALD TRUMP?

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

The question in this blog headline has stumped me for years, though, on occasion, potential answers have crossed my mind.

Many who supported Trump just wanted someone who would oppose government.

But, why would reasonable Americans support a man who has no experience in government, who actually detests those in government, who holds women as nothing other than sexual objects, who criticizes everyone who doesn’t agree automatically with him, who practices racism, and who…?

You could go on and on.

Now, this epitome of narcissism wants to be president again.

Perish the thought.

Well, Wall Street Journal columnist Peggy Noonan came up with some additional answers in a column she wrote last week.  Here are key excerpts that appeared under this headline:  The Indictment Can Only Hurt Trump:  Even his loyal supporters will understand that his mishandling of documents endangered U.S. security.

Noonan reviewed columns she had written about Trump eight years ago, in the summer of 2015, when he first sought to enter government life.

  • In early July, just after his public announcement, Noonan saw him this way:  “Donald Trump is an unstable element inserted into an unsettled environment.  Sooner or later there will be a boom.  He has poor impulse control and is never above the fray.  He likes to start fights.  That’s a weakness.  Eventually he’ll lose one.”
  • But, she added, Donald Trump has a real following, and people make a mistake in assuming his appeal is limited to Republicans.  His persona and particular brand of populism have hit a nerve among some independents and moderate Democrats too.
  • “They think he’s real, that he’s under nobody’s thumb, that maybe he’s a big-mouth, but he’s a truth-teller.  He’s afraid of no one, he’s not politically correct.  He’s rich and can’t be bought by some billionaire, because he is the billionaire.  He’s talking about what people are thinking and don’t feel free to say.”
  • Noonan said she grappled with what she saw as a spreading movement. “His rise is not due to his supporters’ anger at government.  It is a gesture of contempt for government, for the men and women in Congress, the White House, the agencies.  It is precisely because people have lost their awe for the presidency that they imagine Trump as a viable president.”  
  •  “When citizens are consistently offended by Washington, . . . they become contemptuous. They see Trump’s contempt and identify. What the American establishment has given us the past 20 years is sex scandals, money scandals, two unwon wars, an economic collapse, an inadequate recovery, and borders we no longer even pretend to control.  They think:  What will you give us next, the plague?”  Trump voices their indignation.

So, now we have Trump under two indictments, the second of which, at the very least, raises a question about his ability to protect America’s national security interests.  Apparently to indicate his own importance, he sequestered a variety of classified documents at his Mar-A-Lago retreat in Florida, open for nearly anyone to see.

He has no instincts to support America’s well-being.  What he wants is for everyone to know how important he is – or at least he was.

For my part, I hope the “was” remains.

And, I cannot imagine what still prompts smart Americans to support this stooge.  In light of his antics, if that is what they are, there is no rational explanation.

OREGONIAN NEWSPAPER COMES UP WITH AN EDITORIAL…FINALLY

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

As a long-time reader of newspapers – I guess I like to get ink on my hands – I rue the day some time ago that the Oregonian newspaper quit writing editorials, at least most of time.

Not because I always agreed with the viewpoints of those who wrote the editorials.  But, rather, because they got me to think.

Last weekend, the Oregonian showed up with an editorial that appeared under this headline:  Legislators’ compromise a win for Oregon.

I agree with the basic thrust of the editorial as it commended a compromise between Democrats and Republicans that allowed the Oregon Senate to get back to business with only a few more days to go until the required end of the session, June 25.

Here is the way the editorial started:

“The agreements that ended the Republican-led walkout at the Oregon Legislature won’t please the ideological purists or the one-issue voters who equate compromise with betrayal.

“But for the millions of Oregonians who live with compromise as a reality of daily life, the re-start of the legislative session is an enormous relief. Oregonians need legislation that helps provide more housing and removes barriers to construction.  They need behavioral health investments that answer the urgency of the mental health and addiction crises playing out across the state.  They need reforms to Oregon’s broken public defense system to ensure representation for those charged with crimes.  And they need the Legislature to act this session ­– not wait for next year’s.”

Democrats, the writers said, made the right call to compromise on abortion and gun-safety bills to allow time address numerous emergencies facing Oregonians.

“Oregon is already among the most liberal states in the country on ensuring abortion access and has adopted several laws in recent years that help reduce gun violence.  And, while Democrats hold majorities in both chambers of the Legislature, they need enough Republican or Independent legislators to attend Senate floor sessions to meet the constitutionally required two-thirds minimum of legislators to vote on bills.”

The editorial contended that legislators cannot keep playing “a game of chicken,” where Oregonians are the ones who end up caught in the collision of agendas, left and right.

So, the newspaper suggested that the best option was reducing the minimum for a quorum in the House or the Senate.

That may sound good, but it would require another vote by the people to achieve the objective.

So, how about this?  My view is that the best ways to avoid further legislative walkouts are to:

  • Expect Democrats and Republicans to find a way to work together rather than hew only to the left or the right.  That’s why we elected them – to represent us in Salem.
  • Expect them to accept that compromise is a useful vehicle to achieve results because the best solutions often lie in the middle, not either extreme.
  • Expect Democrats who are now in charge and are likely to remain so in the near future to find a way to deal directly and authentically with Republicans.  That will require two things:  First, finding out more about rural Oregon (because Republicans represent that area of the state) and, second, once they find out, care about rural perspectives.
  • Expect Republicans to play the role of a genuine minority, recognizing that they are not in charge and, therefore, will have to settle on occasion for what the majority wants.

Easier said than done.

Unfortunately, it’s unclear whether some legislators in Salem will ever get behind the idea of compromise.  Several Republican and Independent senators failed to show up for the floor session last Friday.  While they may already be disqualified from running for re-election under Measure 113, it is possible that a few of them don’t care.

Or, they intend to rely on courts to overturn the voter-passed “walkout prevention” law on the basis that, if nothing else, it is confusing.

The Oregonian continues:

“Oregon used to pride itself on leaders’ ability to find solutions through bi-partisan pragmatism.  But we’ve moved away from the ‘Oregon Way’ to a legislative philosophy that might makes right.  

“Certainly, the majority – whether Democratic or Republican – has the power to do as it pleases.  But Oregon’s civic health, frayed from divisive national politics, disinformation campaigns and mistrust among fellow Oregonians, needs a more magnanimous strategy that seeks to pull people into the circle rather than pummel an agenda through.”

Agreed.

As a retired lobbyist who held that title for about 40 years, I am just glad I am no longer involved in the legislative process. 

I hope it improves – or, perhaps better put – goes back to the old way of doing things when compromise was not a dirty word.

SPORTS CAN STILL AMAZE

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

If you want a little relief from political wrongdoings, just look at recent developments in sports.

Sportswriter John Feinstein wrote about three very positive developments:

  • Novak Djovick won the French Open tennis tournament for his 23rd grand slam title, the most of any player in history.
  • Canadian golfer Nick Taylor sunk a 72-foot on the fourth hole of a playoff to win his country’s open, the first Canadian to do so in nearly 70 years.
  • Serbian player Nikola Jokic led the Denver Nuggets to their first National Basketball Association title in years, doing it by almost literally carrying his team on his back in the final game.

Great sports, all.

And, there was one more today. 

I just finished watching the U.S. Golf Open at Los Angeles Country Club and former University of Oregon golfer Wyndham Clark produced a tight win against other top players, including by one stroke over Rory McIlroy.

In winning, Clark gave credit to his late mother who died a few years ago after a battle with breast cancer and told her son, before she left this life, to do something beyond himself, thus becoming a role model for others.

He lived up to that dream today, looking up to the sky often during his 18-holes, as if his mother was looking down on him.

The scene on the 18th green after his two-putt for par was emotional.  He greeted his family and gave great credit to his caddy, John Ellis, who left a job as assistant golf coach at the U of O to take a job as Clark’s caddy.

They performed very well together.

Focusing on these developments game me a respite from too much politics, especially all the developments in the multiple indictments Donald Trump faces.

Better to revel in sports than be repelled by dumb politics which seem to be all around us these days.

DID YOU KNOW THAT DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN INDICTED?

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

If you didn’t know about the indictment, you have not been paying attention to politics over the past few days.  Or, you have been sleeping under a rock.

Understandable!

What political developments have come to in this country could not have been predicted years ago, even if some of us remember when then-president Richard Nixon got engulfed in what came to be called “Watergate,” then was pardoned by his successor, Gerald Ford.

Hindsight suggests that Ford’s act could have been described as an example of statesmanship, regardless of the political consequences.

But, today, we have a former president, Donald Trump, who faces criminal trials on multiple issues, including his indictment on violating national security by keeping a huge trove of confidential papers after he left office – papers that we lying around at his residence at Mar-A-Lago for anyone to see.

My view:  Given Trump’s stunning disrespect for the rule of law – everything is always about him — he deserves to be held to account.

A couple media writers over the last couple days produced comments worth considering.

In the Wall Street Journal, retired editor Gerard Baker wrote under this headline:  Trump’s Indictment May Pull Us Back From the Brink:  But if we’re stuck with a rematch between him and Biden in the 2024 presidential election, the losing side is sure to call it illegitimate.

Here is how Baker started his column:

“If you perused Twitter, sampled a cross-section of our leading newspapers, or dipped randomly in and out of the ever-rising tower of Babel on cable, talk radio and podcasts in the past few days, you were given a vivid demonstration of the binary principle on which our political discourse now operates.

“You have the impression that approximately half the people of this country regard the federal indictment of Donald Trump as the greatest affirmation of republican democracy since the surrender at Appomattox, while the other half view it as the greatest abuse of power since George III tried to levy a stamp tax on his colonial subjects.

“One lachrymose letter-writer to the New York Times, Dody Osborne Cox of Guilford, Connecticut, captured the former sentiment perfectly in a missive directed at the prosecutor:  ‘Jack Smith, all I can say is thank you. Thank you for believing in our country.  Thank you for trying to uphold our democracy.  Thank you for your courage.  I have tears in my eyes.  You have restored my hope.  Grateful.  Stay well.’

“Any moist eyes on Trump’s side are tears of hot rage. ‘It’s disgusting,’ Linda Clapper, 75, of Plum Borough, Pennsylvania, told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.  ‘I think they’re after him and going to do anything they can to stop his momentum.’”

Baker says many believe that the case against Trump “is a devastating charge sheet that, if validated in court, suggests behavior by a former president so recklessly indifferent to U.S. national security, so contemptuous of the law, and so preening and vain as to be — on its own, aside from anything else we may have ever heard or read about this man — disqualifying for any public office, let alone the highest in the land.”’

The other commentator was Tom Nichol who writes for Atlantic Magazine.

Here are excerpts of what he wrote:

“Perhaps former Attorney General William Barr said it best:  ‘I was shocked by the degree of sensitivity of these documents and how many there were … and I think the counts under the Espionage Act that he willfully retained those documents are solid counts.  If even half of it is true, then he’s toast.’

“I’m not so sure about the ‘toast’ part.  Trump lucked out by drawing Judge Aileen Cannon, whom he appointed and whose last involvement with one of his cases produced a decision so biased in his favor and so poorly reasoned that a federal appeals court — including two more Trump appointees — overturned her ruling in a judicial body slam.

“And a Florida jury raises the odds that someone in one panel will simply refuse to convict no matter how strong the case.

“Let’s just say that I will be pleasantly surprised if Trump one day faces anything worse than a few rounds of golf with an ankle monitor.”

As for the ankle monitor, despite the principle that someone – anyone – is innocent until proven guilty – I hope Trump gets what is coming to him, given his over-the-top conduct.  That means time in prison.

Not to mention avoiding a second Trump term in the White House, though New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof (yes, he tried to run for Oregon governor the last time around) wonders if it would be possible for Trump to serve as president from a prison cell.

Good question.

LET’S PUT GOLF PROS ON THE CLOCK!  A FASTER GAME WOULD BE GOOD FOR EVERYONE

This is the title I chose for my personal blog, which is meant to give me an outlet for one of my favorite crafts – writing – plus to use an image from my favorite sport, golf.  Out of college, my first job was as a reporter for the Daily Astorian in Astoria, Oregon, and I went on from there to practice writing in all my professional positions, including as press secretary in Washington, D.C. for a Democrat Congressman from Oregon (Les AuCoin), as an Oregon state government manager in Salem and Portland, as press secretary for Oregon’s last Republican governor (Vic Atiyeh), and as a private sector lobbyist.  This blog also allows me to link another favorite pastime – politics and the art of developing public policy – to what I write.  I could have called this blog “Middle Ground,” for that is what I long for in both politics and golf.  The middle ground is often where the best public policy decisions lie.  And it is where you want to be on a golf course.

My friend George Peper has gone on record again in favor of speeding up the game of golf.

A friend?  Yes.

Truth be told, I don’t know Peoer personally, but he is one of the best golf writers going these days.  He serves now as editor of Links Magazine and, previously, was the long-time editor of Golf Magazine.

Then, he, his wife, and his dog spent two years living on the 18th tee at St. Andrews Golf Links in Fife, Scotland.  There, he became a member of the Royal & Ancient Golf Links, as well as a member of St. Andrews.

All that sparked a great book – Two Years in St. Andrews – which is one of my favorites.

In the current issue of Links, Peper wrote under this headline:  “It’s time for the PGA Tour to identify, embarrass, and punish its worst offenders.”

Peper wrote on:

“If you’re a major league baseball fan, you’re likely loving the game more than ever this year thanks to a number of innovations, most notably a pitch clock that forces pitchers to deliver their fastballs faster.  The result has been a much swifter pace of play (games this year are finishing an average of 25 minutes sooner than a year ago), a new element of drama on the mound, and, best of all, the chance for kids to watch all nine innings and still get a decent night’s sleep.”

Peper contends it’s time for pro golf to follow suit.

He says that “as every other aspect of modern life speeds up, our beloved game is slowing down — and so is interest in it.  TV ratings for the PGA Tour have been sagging for years and while golf participation is up, much of that increase has come from the popularity of Topgolf and other bowling-alley knockoffs where the uninitiated can hit a few shots, have a few yucks, and go home.”

Peper squarely blames the PGA Tour for the fact that golf is slowing down, not speeding up.

“I put a large measure of the blame on the PGA Tour,” he writes.  “It has long had the power to change the pace of play, not just within its own ranks but, by example, with the general golf populace.

“To date, however, they’ve done nothing—at least nothing positive.”

It may be true that Jack Nicklaus sparked the golf slowdown in the professional ranks many years ago, for he was “good” at pacing off yardages, stepping back from the ball to peer pensively at every shot, and freezing over putts.  And, he was imitated by many others.

Notable footdraggers include golfers Keegan Bradley, Patrick Cantlay, Padrag Harrington, J.B. Holmes, Justin Rose, and Jordan Spieth, the last one once taking nine minutes to figure out how to play a single shot.

At the same time, kudos should go to Matt Every, Matt Fitzpatrick, Rickie Fowler, Max Homa, Chris Kirk, Brooks Koepka, and Rory McIlroy for trying to move the game along.  They often have complained how long it takes to play a round of golf, often more than five hours for 18 holes.

While obviously I am not a golf pro, I am a golfer and, over the years, I have played fast.  I wish others would, as well.

I also wonder about the official golf rule which says that, when players reach the spot of their golf ball and pull a club, they have 40 seconds to play a shot.

Not on the PGA Tour.  The 40-second rule is never enforced.

Peper offers a list of solutions:

1.  Go to Rolex and sell them on the idea of the Rolex Shot Clock.

2.  Post a walking “clock marshal” in every group to operate the stopwatch and ensure timings are fair and accurate. (The Rolex money will more than cover this.)

3.  Equip each player with a stopwatch that mirrors the marshal’s watch as it counts down and has a “vibrate and beep” option for the last 10 seconds.

4.  Give the players a few weeks to get used to the clock, then roll it out for real.  No “warnings” for bad times:  The first violation and each one thereafter brings a one-stroke penalty.

5.  Make the ticking clock an integral part of every Tour telecast, displayed in a box on the TV screen as it is in baseball, basketball, and football.

6.  Promote the clock.  Get Jim Nantz, Dan Hicks, and the rest talking about it, building the drama, and giving everyone another reason to tune in to telecasts.

7.  Make the slow player “observation list” public.  In fact, call it what it is, the Slowest Players on the Tour.

8. Don’t just embarrass the offenders, keep a running “Fastest Players on the Tour List,” and get another corporate angel … FedEx would be a good fit — to fund a bonus pool for those who finish the year among the top 10. (Doesn’t this seem more worthy than the current Player Impact Program, which rewards the guys who do the best job of promoting themselves?)

And, finally, this from Peper:

“A shot clock on the PGA Tour has the potential to do much more than speed up the pros.  It will improve the overall image and appeal of the Tour, add excitement — and viewers — to telecasts, and reward the players who can read situations intuitively and play decisively, with feel and conviction rather than dithering deliberation.

“The biggest winner will be the game of golf.”

From my spot in the cheap seats, I add another idea.  Do what the Europeans did once, which was to station golf carts to follow along with each player group.  Affix a shot clock on each cart.  Start the clock when a player arrives at his golf ball.  Allow 40 seconds to play.  Encourage TV to cover the clocks.

And, if a player exceeds 40 seconds, dole out a one-stroke penalty.  Before long, pros would play faster.

Sounds like a fix to me.